America’s Two Assemblies Essay

triggerThe U.S. political sympathies is composed of a bicameral relation back. The first one is the Senate, which is represented every bit by the solid grounds. The second one is the signaling of illustrations, which is represented by population. This frame-up is proposed by the Connecticut Compromise, which combines the proposal of New Jersey and Virginia regarding the issues surrounding the fundament of a new congress. New Jersey, one of the smaller states, insisted that each state should pitch equal representation in the coition. But the Virginia Plan argued that a legislature based on population is more fitting. So as a result, the two proposals were combined satisfactorily clearing the two houses of the Congress (Lader 2002, 55).The U.S. Senate, or the upper house, is bestowed with different index fingers, one of which is the queen to approve the fairnesss and treaties give rised by the presidential or the executive break up of the governing, as well as the ones approach from the lower house. It approves the integritys and treaties by the virtue of two-thirds of votes of the whole Senate population. If that number is non reached, the police force support be outwardly rejected, shelved, or is requested to be revise (Powers and Procedures 2006, 1).The lower house, or the household of Representatives, on the other hired man, is bestowed the power to create bill which, in turn ordain turn into a legality that the whole nation will follow, and eventually, benefit from. The House of Representatives meets to create bills and resolutions, discusses them, and passes them on to the Senate for further review and ratification (The Legislative Process 2006, 1).These are the prefatory functions of both the Houses. The functions of creating justices will be further discussed in this paper to figure that these two assemblies are essential in any system of regime to ensure checks and balances on giving medication power.II. Making a LawA bil l starts from an idea of a person. It wint matter if he is a part of the Congress, a social group or organization, or just a regular citizen. The idea then is brought to the House of Representatives so that they can hear out the pros and cons about it. A group e peculiar(prenominal)ly designed to cater to the needs and the interest of that idea hears it. For example, if the idea is about education, the House Committee on Education and the Workforce handles it. The law starts from a single thought that is processed and formed into a bill (Donovan 2004, 6-11). on the whole American law starts out this way as a bill. A bill is a document that proposes an entirely new law or an amendment to an live oning one. The bill can be passed by any component of the Congress, even though the idea of making a law comes from government departments or from political parties, as announced in the party platforms during alternative campaigns. A bill passed by a constituent of the House of Represen tative as projected by the government is called the organization tear. If an individual member of the Congress passes a bill, it is called a Private Members Bill (Brody 2001, 1-3).A bill is non a law yet it has to be approved first by both the Houses of the Congress, and should be affirmed by the incumbent president. The two Houses of Congress will be assessing the bill and has the power to add proposals to shit the necessary changes in it. These proposals are usually debated on speeches are crafted to pronounce a members stand towards the bill. The Congress will be voting towards the approval or the shelving of the bill. Usually, the bill has to be read thrice and has to go through all the necessary changes in the first place it is success richly passed on each House of Congress (Holder 1997, 1-4).Here, we see the interaction of the two Houses of the Congress. A law can impact the nations economy, and so that the lawmakers themselves, both from the upper or lower house wont make a law that would benefit them individually or wholly. Intense deliberation and scrutiny is performed on the every bill that was conceptualized and is passed in the hope that it will be implemented only to benefit the legion(predicate) (Brady & McCubbins 2002, 17).III. The Showcase of BalanceThe innate need of one House of the Congress for the other shows that there is balance in the legislative branch of the government itself. unrivalled cannot exist without the other. A bill will not pop off a law in the absence of either the houses. There would be no law implemented and conceptualized by just one House alone. A single law has to go through the process as required by both the Houses of the Congress (Sajo 1999, 69).These laws, on the other hand, will not become valid without being finalized and approved by the executive branch of government, which is composed of the chairwoman and his Cabinet. The final say still belongs to the idea of State. But he cannot influence the Co ngress as to what laws they should make or ratify. The executive branch can propose and lobby for a bill, and it cannot fully instruct the Congress to just pass it in its favor. charge if the bill is proposed from the above, it still has to go through the same processes. No special treatment is given (Sajo 1999, 89).At this point, the balance between the two branches of the government, to wit executive and legislative becomes evident. The President of the United States in his supreme power and capacity, cannot, in any way, influence the Congress to infrangiblely work for him. He cannot mandate what laws he wanted to be created and passed over to him for finalization. In essence, his dapple is equal to the legislative office. They work in parallel of each other, so that one cannot take advantage of one another (Sajo 1999, 99).Without the Congress doing its job, the President will receive the freedom of making laws himself for whatever reasons he finds urgent. And laws have a big impact to a nation. One wrong law could mean economic distress. One selfish law could suppress freedom. One inappropriate law could wreak havoc. Without the Congress, the President will have his absolute power. The U.S. democratic form of government is gone and a totalitarian form of government will take its place. When that happens, the power shifts heavily to the executive branch of the government (Borrelli 2002, 18).Another branch of the government is the judicial branch. Although the branch does not actively participate in the law-making process, it is directly involved in the carrying into action of such laws. Even if the legislative body makes the laws and the executive finalizes it, they do not participate in the process of making sure that the laws are fully observed and strictly followed by all members of the society. This is the job of the judiciary. The law applies to all, and that includes the lawmakers who created them and the President of the United States himself. W ithout the judicial branch of government doing its assigned task of maintaining amity and peace within the nations constituents, the laws would become worthless (Berger et al 2001, 606).IV. The Law and the SocietyA harmonious society simply cannot exist unless the people who belong in it respect all the governing law implemented to a considerable degree. Laws have the power to settle reliable issues in the society and the government. If all people respect the law enough, they would accept to reconcile their individual differences to the context of what is right and valid, as provided by the laws provisions.All laws should be respectable and sound enough to be appreciated by everyone. Law and morality should also come hand in hand otherwise, the people will have to choose either to lose their morality or their respect of the law. Laws are created so as to maintain umpire in the society therefore law and justice should be one and the same in the minds of the people (Bastiat 2004, 22).Lawmakers should take it upon themselves to make and amend laws according to the interests of the general public and not for their own personalised gains. Laws should help accelerate the resolution of current social conflicts and national dilemma. both law in the land should represent their citizens accordingly. The law is so powerful it can make a society and that power is also big enough to destroy it in a rather big and win over way (Lempert & Sanders 1986, 15-20).And this is the main responsibility bestowed upon the shoulders of the legislative branch of government. A match government cannot exist in the absence of the Congress. The power will degenerate indefinitely to either the judicial or the executive branch. And the result of that can prove to be perilous to the society (Lempert & Sanders 1986, 26-27).V. ConclusionThe American law is intensely compiled, created, and enacted to serve a greater purpose in the society. The interference of enhancing the laws does n ot depend solely on the solons and lawmakers. We, as individual members of the society, have an immense duty to promote and participate in the creation of these laws as well. We have to be active members of the society and have to make a mark for our own good. We should all help the legislative branch to retain the balance of power in the government and the society.Works CitedBastiat, Frederick. (2004). The Law. Montana Kessinger Publishing.Berger, Marsall J., Schatz Gerald S., Laufer Deborah S. (2001). federal Administrative Dispute Resolution Deskbook. Illinois American Bar Association.Borrelli, Maryanne. (2002). The Presidents Cabinet Gender, Power, and Representation. Colorado Lynne Rienner Publishers.Brady, David W & McCubbins, Matthew D. (2002). Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress New Perspectives on the History of Congress. California Stanford University Press.Brody, David C. (2001). Criminal Law. Maryland Jones and bartlett Publishers.Donovan, Sandy. (2004). Making Laws A Look at How a Bill Becomes a Law. Minnesota Lerner Publications.Holder, Angela R. (1997). The Meaning of the Constitution. New York Barrons Educational Series.Lader, Curt. (2002). Barrons How to Prepare for the Ap U.S. Government and Politics. New York Barrons Educational Series.Lempert, Richard & Sanders Joseph. (1986). An Invitation to Law and Social Science Deserts, Disputes and Distribution. Philadelphia University of daddy Press.Powers & Procedures. (2006). United States Senate. Online Available at http//www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/one_item_and_teasers/powers.htm.Sajo, Andras. (1999). Limiting Government An Introduction to Constitutionalism. New York Central European University Press.The Legislative Process. (2006). United State House of Represenatives. Online Available at http//www.house.gov/house/Tying_it_all.shtml.