Employment Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Employment Law - Case Study ExampleShe is condition a post of vice president despite of her disability and continue to deliver her anticipation at the highest take that oversees the company achieve profit maximization level at hand. The problem arise in her literary argument of work when she accepted the clothing industry to initiate and urge to contact initiatives with her subordinate group on the basis of creating a concretion that will oversee the fate of the employee at large. The C.E.O. and Board of Directors is furious, and call her in and threaten to fire her for allowing union representatives in the company. She meticulously relates that the law says, that she can non discourage or intimidate employees to persevere any union from addressing employees, besides they again rebuke her for her so called poor judgment. The identity card members states that, they will define back to her shortly. This case reflects a lot of unlawful instances in the way she ends up being treat ed. The detail that she is threatened is itself a bleach of law. Kayte Clark is herself a disabled employee but her situation has fully been considered. She is even spreadn the chance to advance to a top position despite her condition of being a effeminate worker and above all, being disabled. The major problem seems to come in when she decides to address the issue of new(prenominal) workers. She feels that these workers are hardly considered by the management. Her judgment is solely correct in contrast to what other individuals proclaim. The board is sheltering the companys position in the expense of the subordinate workers and any attempt to give these workers a chance to review their working conditions through a trade/labor union puts her into a difficult situation. Given that she has been working for the company for more than 20 years, there threats hardly mean anything to do with losing her job or even her immediate position. She is protected by Title VII in legion(predic ate) ways. She can hardly be punished for relating with her subordinates, because she is disabled, because she is a woman. A major reason why she should not face any punishment is that she not caused any positive damage to the company. While the title protect employers who discriminate based on protecting certain traits, which could hinder occupational qualifications, subordinate workers have the serious to join any labor unions that would fight for their rights. Kayte Clark has no right in preventing them from joining trade unions, but instead, she can help them in achieving their right to good working conditions among other benefits. Furthermore according to the Labor-Management coverage and Disclosure Act, workers are entitled to join any union as long as the union has been availed under the constitution act amendment. In the United States of America, we have got the office of labor-management standards (OLMS) amended under labor-management inform and Disclosure act formed in the year 1959 which covers unions and employees of this unions based on their postal services. The LMRDA Title VI bill of rights states that the authority to investigate a prohibition on a union fining, suspending, expelling, or differently disciplining members for exercising their rights under the LMRDA and a prohibition on