Good vs Evil †English Essay Essay

in that location is neither a definite good nor evil, but only the colorise area in-between. The Japanese proverb of Yin and Yang states that in all good in that respect is somewhat evil and in all evil there is bonce good thus without good there can be no evil and without evil there can be no good. lousiness was once described to me as The inability to feel sympathy and at first I agreed with this analogy but upon further concept and deliberation I decided that it was not entirely true, for if evil is the inability to feel sympathy then that ease ups all toys of sympathy good. However, that analogy would make an act, one that almost the entire world agrees is purely evil, an act of good.The act in question is the destruction of the twin towers of 9/11, because the perpetrators were sympathetic. They were sympathetic towards their ground and their people who, contrary to popular knowledge, had already been invaded and were being oppressed by the USA who were trying to secu re their oil reserves.There is no flair to moderate universally what is considered good and evil. Every man believes in some way that their induce actions are only and righteous whilst also believe that their enemys actions are acts of evil purely because they oppose his knowledge wishes thus making all man good in his own eyes even evil in the eyes of those he opposes. each(prenominal) and every one of us must decide for ourselves what is good and what is evil, and yet we must still conform to the norms of hostel. The definition of what is right and what is wrong may come from many different places. Some blindly accept what inn tells then to where others question society and still others actively oppose societys views. Some get their definition from the relative religious give-and-take and follow that without question whereas others merely see it as a everyday guideline whereupon to base their actions.I believe that the concepts of good and bad, righteousness and evil, ju st and unjust exist purely to justify mans actions and that they cook and will continue to change to fit the person whose action requires justifying. Alas, these headstrong opposing forces are bound to perpetually clash as they get through for a balance. For without either life as we know it could never exist, maybe life at all could not exist.